Reply to comment

Most pages have not been translated to english yet. But feel free to contact me, if you need anything.

Sorry for my delay in responding. I became ill.

I started again, taking special care not to exclude any periods. I got another message that I realized, from reading one of your other answers to another post, that I had the RMSEA values reversed. I made H0 smaller than H1 and it worked. However, I am concerned that I am misinterpreting something because it doesn't make sense to me that a larger RMSEA would be the H1. Further concerning me is the suspiciously small sample size I am getting for H1 RMSEA=.05, H0 RMSEA=15, which is 11.33. Changing them to .05 and .08 respectively, yields an estimated N of 66.

Am I thinking about this incorrectly? Thank you for your responsiveness.
Katherine

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Facebook Delicious
LinkedIn Google JKU
XING
Logo Selmar GnambsCreative CommonsDrupal