Most pages have not been translated to english yet. But feel free to contact me, if you need anything.
Katherine wrote on Sun, 2010-04-18 19:29
Sorry for my delay in responding. I became ill.
I started again, taking special care not to exclude any periods. I got another message that I realized, from reading one of your other answers to another post, that I had the RMSEA values reversed. I made H0 smaller than H1 and it worked. However, I am concerned that I am misinterpreting something because it doesn't make sense to me that a larger RMSEA would be the H1. Further concerning me is the suspiciously small sample size I am getting for H1 RMSEA=.05, H0 RMSEA=15, which is 11.33. Changing them to .05 and .08 respectively, yields an estimated N of 66.
Am I thinking about this incorrectly? Thank you for your responsiveness.
Katherine
Sorry for my delay in responding. I became ill.
I started again, taking special care not to exclude any periods. I got another message that I realized, from reading one of your other answers to another post, that I had the RMSEA values reversed. I made H0 smaller than H1 and it worked. However, I am concerned that I am misinterpreting something because it doesn't make sense to me that a larger RMSEA would be the H1. Further concerning me is the suspiciously small sample size I am getting for H1 RMSEA=.05, H0 RMSEA=15, which is 11.33. Changing them to .05 and .08 respectively, yields an estimated N of 66.
Am I thinking about this incorrectly? Thank you for your responsiveness.
Katherine